Course contents
Foundation · Course 7: Money in the Apparel Business · Lesson 2 of 5

Costing a garment: fabric, trims, making charge, overhead and profit

Level: FoundationTime: 45 minutesOrder used: A (the T-shirt)Tool: Costing sheet
This lesson is for anyone who builds or reads a garment costing sheet: a merchandiser, a factory owner, a buyer, or a student. Lesson 7.1 is helpful but not required. Money figures are teaching examples in US dollars. At work, use the real numbers of your own order.
BuyerNorthline Apparel (overseas clothing brand)
FactoryDelta Garments (garment factory)
ProductBasic cotton T-shirt, one colour
Quantity15,000 pieces
FOB priceUSD 3.20 per piece
Cost componentsFabric, trims, making, overhead, profit
A garment costing sheet on a desk with a calculator and fabric swatch.
A garment costing sheet on a desk with a calculator and fabric swatch.
02Opening

This page is for anyone who builds or checks a garment's costing sheet

A costing sheet is the document that shows how a garment's price is built, component by component, and it is the tool a merchandiser uses every time a price is quoted, questioned, or renegotiated. Lesson 7.1 named the five cost components that stack up to a garment's price: fabric, trims, making, overhead and profit. This lesson shows you how to build the sheet itself, and one rule matters more than any other: every component's share of the total price must be calculated by a live formula, never typed in by hand. Without that rule, a costing sheet can look correct today and be silently wrong tomorrow, the moment any one cost changes. This lesson mainly teaches the money flow of an order: how a price is built up and checked, piece by piece.

03Before you start

What you need, and what this lesson does not cover

You need: the five cost components from lesson 7.1 (fabric, trims, making, overhead, profit). You do not need to know how to write a spreadsheet formula before starting; this lesson shows you.

By the end of this lesson you can:

  • build a costing sheet with each cost component in its own row and its own typed dollar value;
  • add a total row that sums the components with a formula instead of a typed figure;
  • add a share-of-price column that divides each component by the total with a live formula;
  • check that the five shares of price add up to 100% as a sanity check;
  • explain why a typed percentage goes silently wrong the next time a cost component changes.

Not covered here: how margin and markup carry the price from FOB to the shop shelf (lesson 7.3), and how payment terms affect the factory's cash flow (lesson 7.4).

04Key terms

Words you will meet in this lesson

TermMeaning
Costing sheetThe document that lists a garment's cost components and adds them up to its total price.
Cost componentOne part of a garment's total price: fabric, trims, making, overhead, or profit.
Share of priceWhat percentage of the total price one cost component makes up.
FormulaAn instruction in a spreadsheet cell that calculates a value from other cells, instead of a value typed in by hand.
Typed numberA value entered directly into a cell as a fixed figure, with no formula behind it.
OverheadThe factory's running costs shared across everything it makes: rent, electricity, management.
FOB (free on board)The factory delivers the goods on board the ship at its own port. Freight from there is the buyer's cost.
Ex-factory priceThe price a domestic buyer pays a factory for goods collected or delivered locally, with no export shipping terms attached.
05Teaching
The rule

A costing sheet's shares of price must be calculated by formula, never typed

Building a costing sheet means entering each cost component's own dollar value, then calculating its share of the total price, never typing that share in by hand. The calculation must be a live formula, so that if any one component changes, every share updates automatically, instead of needing to be re-typed by someone who remembers to do it. A costing sheet with typed shares and a costing sheet with formula-driven shares can look identical on the day they are built. The difference only shows up the first time a cost changes.

Fabric's dollar value as a fraction of the total: 1.15 of 3.20 = 0.359375
0.359375 × 100 = 35.9375%, fabric's share of price (rounds to 35.9%)
What you meet in real life

The same five components appear in every costing sheet, but the framing changes

What can differThe shapes you will meetWhy it matters to you
How the total is builtTyped-total costing (the wrong way): someone adds fabric, trims, making, overhead and profit on a calculator and types the answer into the total cell. Formula-driven costing (the right way): the total and every share are formulas referencing the component cells.A typed total looks the same as a formula-driven one until one component changes, and then the typed total silently goes stale while the formula updates itself.
Export or domestic pricingOrder A's costing is framed as an FOB export price. Cedar & Co.'s own domestic costing follows the same five-component structure, but without an FOB framing: its "price" is what it pays Delta Garments ex-factory, then it adds its own local delivery cost.The five components stay the same, but the price you compare against changes: an export FOB price is not the same figure as a domestic ex-factory price plus delivery.
The product being costedThe same five-component method applies to Order B, the jeans, even though the exact cost figures differ from Order A's T-shirt.Learning the method on one product lets you cost any product; the numbers change, the structure does not.
Who reads the sheetA merchandiser builds it to quote a price. A buyer reads it to judge whether a price is fair. A factory owner reads it to see where the margin sits.The same sheet must answer different questions for different readers, which is only possible if every number in it can be trusted and traced back to a formula.
The case we follow

Order A's costing sheet: Delta Garments builds up the USD 3.20 FOB price

Delta Garments builds the costing sheet for Order A, Northline Apparel's 15,000-piece basic cotton T-shirt. Five cost components sit in the sheet, each entered as its own dollar value: fabric USD 1.15, trims USD 0.20, making USD 1.10, overhead USD 0.49, profit USD 0.26. A total row sums them with a formula, giving the FOB price of USD 3.20. Beside each component's dollar value sits a share-of-price column, calculated by a formula, never typed.

Cost componentOrder A (USD per piece)Share of price (formula)
Fabric1.1535.9%
Trims0.206.25%
Making1.1034.375%
Overhead0.4915.3125%
Profit0.268.125%
Total (FOB price)3.20100%
The worked number

Every one of Order A's five shares comes from the same formula, dividing the component by the total

Fabric is 0.359375 of the total; 0.359375 × 100 = 35.9375% (fabric's share, rounds to 35.9%)
Trims is 0.0625 of the total; 0.0625 × 100 = 6.25% (trims' share)
Making is 0.34375 of the total; 0.34375 × 100 = 34.375% (making's share)
Overhead is 0.153125 of the total; 0.153125 × 100 = 15.3125% (overhead's share)
Profit is 0.08125 of the total; 0.08125 × 100 = 8.125% (profit's share)
Order A: FOB price USD 3.20 per piece Fabric 1.15 USD Making 1.10 USD Overhead 0.49 USD Profit 0.26 USD Trims 0.20 USD
The five components stack to Order A's full FOB price. Fabric and making together make up more than 70% of the price; every bar segment above is a formula result, not a typed figure.

The five shares add up to 100%, which is the sanity check that tells you the formulas are wired correctly.

First two shares added: 35.9375 + 6.25 = 42.1875

Adding all five shares at full precision (35.9375, 6.25, 34.375, 15.3125 and 8.125) gives exactly 100%, confirming the formulas are wired correctly. The commonly quoted rounded figures (35.9%, 6.25%, 34.375%, 15.3125% and 8.125%) sum to 99.9625% only because fabric's own share was rounded down for readability.

The method

Build a costing sheet in five steps

  1. List every cost component in its own row: fabric, trims, making, overhead, profit.
  2. Enter each component's dollar value directly into its own cell, never a running total.
  3. Add a total row that sums the components with a formula, not a typed figure.
  4. Add a share-of-price column that divides each component by the total with a formula.
  5. Confirm the five shares sum to 100% as a sanity check that the formulas are correct.
The trap

A common mistake is typing a percentage share by hand after calculating it once on a calculator

A common mistake is typing a percentage share into a costing sheet after working it out once on a separate calculator, since the number is correct at the moment it is typed. The moment any cost component changes, for example a fabric price rise or a new overhead rate, the typed percentage is now silently wrong until someone remembers to redo the calculation and retype it. A formula-driven cell never goes stale this way, because it recalculates itself every time the sheet opens or a component changes.

Typed number (wrong way)Formula (right way)Fabric cell changes: 1.15 to 1.05Share cell still shows 36% (typed)Fabric cell changes: 1.15 to 1.05Share cell recalculates to 33.9%Nobody edited the share cell,so it is now silently wrong.The formula reads the fabric cell,so it always matches it.
A typed share goes silently wrong; a formula-driven share updates itself. If fabric drops from USD 1.15 to USD 1.05, the total also drops, and only a formula-driven share reflects the new number correctly.
06In plain words

A costing sheet lists a garment's five cost parts: fabric, trims, making, overhead, profit. Each one gets its own dollar value, typed in by hand. The total is added up by a formula, never typed. Each part's share of the total price is also worked out by a formula, never typed. This matters because if a formula does the work, then changing one dollar value updates everything else by itself. If a person types the share instead, that share stays exactly as typed even after the dollar values change, and nobody may notice it is now wrong.

07Quick check
  • A costing sheet has five cost components: fabric, trims, making, overhead, profit.
  • The total row is a formula that sums the components, never a typed figure.
  • The share-of-price column is a formula that divides each component by the total, never typed.
  • The five shares of price always sum to 100%; if they do not, a formula is wired wrong.
  • A typed percentage is correct only until the next cost change, then it is silently wrong.
  • The same five-component method applies to an export FOB price and a domestic ex-factory price alike.
08Workplace scenario

Mona types "36%" into the fabric share cell instead of entering a formula

Mona builds Order A's costing sheet at Delta Garments. Pressed for time, she has already worked out fabric's share of the price on a separate calculator, so she types "36%" directly into the fabric share cell instead of entering a formula.

Here is the row as Mona leaves it:

Costing sheet, fabric row. Cost component: Fabric. Order A (USD per piece): 1.15. Order A's share of price: 36% (typed in by Mona, not a formula).

Does this shortcut cause any immediate problem? Decide before opening the answer.

Show decision

Not immediately. Two facts decide this together.

First, today's number is correct. Fabric is USD 1.15 of a USD 3.20 total, a share of about 35.9%, which rounds to the 36% Mona typed. Nothing on the sheet is wrong today.

Second, the risk sits in the future, not the present. The moment the fabric price changes, for example if a cheaper cotton source lowers fabric to USD 1.05, the typed 36% is now silently wrong until Mona remembers to recalculate and retype it. A formula-driven cell would have updated itself automatically, showing 33.9% (1.05 of a new USD 3.10 total) the moment the fabric cell changed.

Neither fact alone tells the full story. Looking only at today's number would say the shortcut is harmless. Looking only at future risk without checking today's number would miss that the sheet is not wrong yet. The real risk is not today's number; it is every future update this sheet will ever need.

09What it costs

A stale, hand-typed share can misdirect where a factory looks to cut cost

Framed qualitatively, a stale, hand-typed percentage that nobody catches can lead to a wrong assumption about which cost component actually drives the price most, the point lesson 7.1 already made about fabric's outsized share. If a typed fabric share of 36% is left in place after fabric's real share has moved to 33.9%, someone reading the sheet may keep treating fabric as more dominant than it now is, and misdirect negotiation effort toward fabric when overhead or making has meanwhile become the bigger lever. This is a cost this lesson avoids entirely by insisting on formulas, not typed numbers, for every share of price.

Fabric is 0.338710 of the new total (1.05 of 3.10); 0.338710 × 100 = 33.871%, the true share (rounds to 33.9%)

Fabric's typed share, left stale at 36%, no longer matches the sheet once its true share has moved to about 33.9%, a gap of roughly 2 percentage points of misleading information for anyone still reading the old typed figure.

10Working template

Costing sheet: build Order A's row, then your own order's row

The Costing sheet has five columns: cost component, Order A's amount, Order A's share of price, your order's amount (a yellow input cell), and your share of price. Order A's rows are filled in already, totalling 3.20. Its share-of-price column and total row are live formulas, never typed numbers: each share divides the row's amount by the total, and the total sums the components above it. For your own order, type each component's dollar value into the yellow column only, leaving every share cell and the total row untouched. If your five shares do not sum to 100%, a formula has been overwritten with a typed number, and that cell needs fixing first.

[Download the Costing sheet](../../templates/T01-C07-costing-sheet.xlsx)

Download the Costing sheet (Excel)

11Check yourself

1. Why must a costing sheet's share-of-price column be a formula rather than a typed number?

2. What do Order A's five cost-component shares of price add up to?

3. A 3,000-piece order has a total price of USD 9.80 per piece, and its trims cost USD 0.35 per piece. What is trims' share of price?

12Glossary
ENARFRTRMeaning
Costing sheetكشف التكلفةFiche de coûtsMaliyet tablosuThe document that lists a garment's cost components and adds them to the price the factory quotes.
Cost componentعنصر التكلفةÉlément de coûtMaliyet bileşeniOne part of a garment's total price: fabric, trims, making, overhead, or profit.
Share of priceنسبة السعرPart du prixFiyat payıOne cost component's dollar value divided by the total price, usually shown as a percentage.
Formulaصيغة حسابيةFormuleFormülAn instruction in a spreadsheet cell that calculates a value from other cells, instead of a value typed in by hand.
Typed numberرقم مكتوب يدويًاNombre saisi manuellementElle girilen sayıA value entered directly into a cell as a fixed figure, with no formula behind it.
Overheadالتكاليف العامةFrais générauxGenel giderlerThe factory's running costs shared across everything it makes: rent, electricity, management.
FOB (free on board)تسليم على ظهر السفينة في ميناء المصنعFOB (franco à bord)FOB (gemide teslim)The factory delivers the goods on board the ship at its own port. Freight from there is the buyer's cost.
Ex-factory priceسعر خروج المصنعPrix départ usineFabrika çıkış fiyatıWhat the buyer pays the factory for the finished goods, at the factory's own gate, before any delivery cost is added.
13Next

Lesson 7.3: Margin and markup

You can now build a costing sheet whose shares of price update themselves. The next lesson uses that same sheet to work out margin and markup as the garment moves from the factory's FOB price to the wholesale price and the shop price. Back to the course map

14Ladder

RecognizeName a costing sheet's five cost components and its total row.
ConnectSee how a share-of-price formula depends on both the component cell and the total cell.
CompareTell a typed-total costing sheet from a formula-driven one.
DecideJudge whether a shortcut like typing a percentage causes an immediate problem or a future one.