A factory can be standing in a warehouse full of finished T-shirts and not own a single one of them. A buyer can own T-shirts that are still sitting on a factory's cutting table on the other side of the world. Ownership and possession are two different things, and mixing them up is one of the most expensive mistakes a new merchandiser can make.
This lesson answers one question: at any point in the chain, which company legally owns the goods. A merchandiser is the person in a factory or a buying company who follows an order from the first request until the goods are shipped. Knowing who owns the goods tells you who carries the loss if something goes wrong, who can sell the goods on, and who can use them as security for a loan. Lesson 1.1 showed you the ten stages and the shapes an order can take. This lesson takes one thread from that picture — ownership — and follows it all the way through.
You need: the idea of a full package order and a CMT order from lesson 1.1. If you have not read lesson 1.1, the key terms below give you enough to continue.
By the end of this lesson you can:
Not covered here: how a price is built (lesson 1.3), who carries transport risk in detail beyond ownership (lesson 1.4), and how a timeline is planned (lesson 1.5).
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Ownership | The legal right to keep, sell or pledge a good. Decided by who paid, not who holds it. |
| Possession | Physically holding or storing goods. A company can possess goods it does not own. |
| Full package order | The factory buys the fabric and trims and sells the finished piece, owning the goods until shipment. |
| CMT (cut, make and trim) | The buyer supplies the fabric and pays the factory only for cutting and sewing. The buyer owns the fabric throughout. |
| Consignment stock | Stock a mill keeps ownership of, even while held at the factory, until the factory actually uses it. |
| Deposit | A partial payment made before an order is finished. It does not usually transfer ownership of the whole order. |
| FOB (free on board) | The factory delivers the goods on board the ship at its own port; ownership and risk normally pass to the buyer there. |
| Goods-in-process | Partly finished goods: cut pieces, garments mid-sewing, garments awaiting inspection. |
| Risk | Who bears the cost of lost or damaged goods. Delivery terms decide who pays freight; the contract decides ownership. |
The rule is simple to state and easy to get wrong in practice: ownership follows who paid for the material or the goods, unless the contract says otherwise. It does not follow who is physically holding them. A factory holding fabric it did not pay for does not own that fabric, no matter how long the fabric sits in its warehouse.
Ownership also does not automatically follow delivery terms. FOB, CIF and DDP (introduced in lesson 1.1) decide who pays freight and who carries transport risk. They are about the journey. The contract's ownership and payment clause decides ownership itself. In most orders these two things are written to happen at the same moment — for example, "ownership and risk pass to the buyer on loading" — but they are two separate promises in the contract, and a contract can set them apart. Read both.
| What can differ | The shapes you will meet | Why it matters to you |
|---|---|---|
| Full package (factory buys fabric) | The factory owns the fabric and the goods made from it until it sells them to the buyer, normally on shipment. | The factory carries the value of the goods, and the loss, until the sale point in the contract. |
| Buyer-nominated / CMT (buyer supplies or pays for fabric) | The buyer owns the fabric from the moment it is delivered to the factory, and owns the goods made from it throughout. The factory never owns them; it only sells labour. | The factory has almost nothing to lose in materials if the order is cancelled — but it also cannot sell the goods on if the buyer does not pay for the sewing. |
| Consignment stock | Occasionally a mill or trim supplier keeps ownership of stock physically held at the factory until the factory actually uses it. Ownership transfers piece by piece, as the factory draws the stock down, not on delivery to the factory. | The factory may be holding materials worth a lot of money that it does not own and cannot use as collateral. |
| Partial payment / deposit | A deposit does not usually transfer ownership of the whole order. Ownership typically transfers on full payment or on shipment, whichever the contract states. | A buyer who has paid a deposit does not automatically own goods still in production; check the contract before assuming otherwise. |
None of these shapes is more "normal" than the others. What decides which one applies to your order is the contract, and the three questions in the method below.
The case we followOrder A is the full package, FOB order from lesson 1.1: Northline Apparel orders 15,000 basic cotton T-shirts from Delta Garments. Delta Garments chooses and pays for the fabric, sews the T-shirts, and delivers them on board the ship at its own port.
Because this is a full package order, Delta Garments owns the fabric from the moment the dyeing and finishing mill delivers it. It owns the cut pieces while they are being sewn. It owns the finished T-shirts sitting in its own warehouse, waiting for the ship. Ownership stays with Delta Garments the whole way through production. It only passes to Northline Apparel at one moment: when the T-shirts are loaded on board the ship at Delta Garments' port. That is the FOB transfer point, and the contract sets ownership to pass there, at the same moment as risk.
| Stage | Who owns the goods | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric delivered to Delta Garments by the dyeing mill | Delta Garments | Delta Garments paid the dyeing mill for the fabric. |
| Fabric being cut | Delta Garments | Same fabric, same owner; cutting does not change who owns it. |
| Cut pieces being sewn | Delta Garments | The pieces are made from fabric Delta Garments owns. |
| Finished T-shirts in Delta Garments' warehouse, before shipment | Delta Garments | Nothing in the contract has transferred ownership yet. |
| T-shirts loaded on board the ship at Delta Garments' port | Northline Apparel, from this moment | This is the FOB transfer point named in the contract: ownership and risk pass here. |
| T-shirts on the ship, in transit | Northline Apparel | Ownership already passed on loading. |
| T-shirts in Northline Apparel's warehouse, in its shops | Northline Apparel | Ownership has not moved again since loading. |
If Order A had been a CMT order instead, Northline Apparel would have owned the fabric and the T-shirts made from it at every one of these stages, even while they sat inside Delta Garments' factory. The stages are the same; the ownership column would be entirely different.
The worked numberAt any point before shipment, Delta Garments owns the value that has accumulated in the goods so far: the fabric, the trims already attached, and the labour already spent making them. Using the Order A cost figures from lesson 1.1's costing (fabric 1.15, trims 0.20, making 1.10, per piece), here is the value per piece that Delta Garments owns at the cutting stage, once cutting and the first sewing steps are done:
USD 36,750 is the value Delta Garments owns, and would lose, if something destroyed the goods before shipment. Northline Apparel owns none of this value yet, because ownership has not reached the FOB transfer point. This is exactly the value at stake in the workplace scenario below.
To find who owns the goods at any point in any order, answer these three questions in order:
Write the answers on the working template in block 10. Do this for any order, at any point in its life, and you will always be able to say who owns the goods.
The trapA common mistake is assuming that physical possession equals ownership. A factory holding fabric supplied by the buyer does not own that fabric. It cannot sell it to someone else, and it cannot use it as collateral for a loan, no matter how long it sits in the factory's stores.
The reverse trap is just as common: assuming that because a factory paid for something once, it still owns it after selling it on. Once Northline Apparel pays for the T-shirts, Northline Apparel owns them — even while they sit in Delta Garments' warehouse waiting for the shipping line to collect them. Delta Garments is holding goods it no longer owns. It must look after them and hand them over, but it cannot decide to sell them to another buyer.
Owning something and holding it are not the same. The company that paid for the material owns it, unless the contract says a different moment decides ownership, such as full payment or shipment. Delivery terms like FOB tell you who pays for the journey; they do not by themselves decide who owns the goods, although the contract often sets ownership to move at the same point. To find out who owns goods right now, find out who paid for them, check whether the contract sets a different ownership point, and check whether that point has been reached. Never assume that whoever is holding the goods owns them.
Order A is finished: all 15,000 T-shirts are sewn, finished and sitting in Delta Garments' warehouse. The ship is not due for four more days. A small electrical fire breaks out in the finishing area and damages 5,000 of the 15,000 T-shirts beyond use. The goods have not yet been picked up by the shipping line.
The sales contract's delivery clause reads:
You are the merchandiser at Delta Garments. Who bears the loss of the 5,000 damaged T-shirts — Delta Garments or Northline Apparel? Decide before you open the decision.
Delta Garments bears the loss. Under the FOB clause, ownership and risk of the T-shirts only pass to Northline Apparel once the goods have been loaded on board the ship nominated by the buyer. That has not happened yet — the ship is still four days away.
Delta Garments still owned the T-shirts when the fire happened, so Delta Garments absorbs the loss, or claims on its own factory insurance if it has cover. Northline Apparel owns nothing at this point and carries none of the loss, even though the T-shirts were made to its order and carry its labels.
If the fire had happened after the T-shirts were loaded on the ship, the answer would reverse: ownership and risk would already have passed to Northline Apparel, and Northline Apparel would bear the loss instead.
Using the same per-piece value from the worked number above, the 5,000 damaged T-shirts had this value at the point of the fire:
Delta Garments loses USD 12,250 in materials and labour, borne entirely by itself, because ownership had not yet passed to Northline Apparel. On top of the money, Delta Garments also loses time: it must re-cut and re-sew 5,000 replacement pieces against a ship date that has not moved. Had the fire happened after loading, this USD 12,250 would have been Northline Apparel's loss instead, and Delta Garments would owe nothing more.
Lesson 1.1 introduced this sheet. This lesson fills in the two rows about ownership. Copy this table into your order file and fill it from the contract, not from memory.
| Question | Order A (filled in) | Your order |
|---|---|---|
| Who buys the fabric? | Factory (full package) | |
| Who owns the fabric in the factory? | Delta Garments, from delivery, until shipment | |
| Does the contract set a different ownership point? | Yes — ownership and risk pass on loading (FOB) | |
| Has that point been reached? | Depends on the date checked; not reached before the ship arrives | |
| Who owns the goods-in-process right now? | Delta Garments, until loaded on the ship | |
| Value owned at cutting stage (15,000 pieces) | USD 36,750 |
1. In a CMT order, who owns the fabric while it is being cut and sewn in the factory?
2. A factory has been paid a 30% deposit on an order that is still mid-production. Does the buyer already own the goods?
3. Under a DDP order (the factory delivers to the buyer's warehouse, duty paid), at what point does risk typically transfer, compared with FOB?
| EN | AR | FR | TR | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | الملكية | Propriété | Mülkiyet | The legal right to a good: to keep it, sell it, or use it as security for a loan. Decided by who paid for it and by the contract. |
| Possession | الحيازة | Possession | Zilyetlik | Physically holding or storing goods. A company can possess goods it does not own. |
| Full package order | طلبية كاملة (المصنع يشتري القماش) | Commande produit fini | Tam paket sipariş | The factory buys the fabric and trims, makes the garment and sells the finished piece. |
| CMT (cut, make and trim) | تشغيل فقط: قص وخياطة على قماش المشتري | Façon (CMT) | Fason (CMT) | The buyer supplies the fabric; the factory is paid only for cutting, sewing and finishing. |
| Consignment stock | مخزون أمانة | Stock en dépôt | Konsinye stok | Stock a supplier keeps ownership of while it is physically held at the factory, until the factory uses it. |
| Deposit | دفعة مقدمة | Acompte | Kapora | A partial payment made before an order is finished. Does not usually transfer ownership of the whole order by itself. |
| FOB (free on board) | تسليم على ظهر السفينة في ميناء المصنع | FOB (franco à bord) | FOB (gemide teslim) | The factory delivers the goods on board the ship at its own port. Ownership and risk normally pass here. |
| Goods-in-process | بضاعة تحت التشغيل | Produits en cours | Yarı mamul | Partly finished goods: cut pieces, garments mid-sewing, garments awaiting inspection. |
| Risk | المخاطرة | Risque | Risk | Who bears the cost if goods are lost, damaged or destroyed. Usually moves with ownership, decided separately in the contract. |
You now know who owns the goods at every point in the chain. The next lesson opens the costing sheet and shows how each cost, from fabric to profit, adds up to the price the factory charges, and how that price climbs on from there. Back to the course map