Course contents
Practitioner · Course 6: Delays, Recovery, Claims and Chargebacks · Lesson 3 of 5

How a buyer's claim for a missed date is calculated and disputed

Level: PractitionerTime: 45 minutesOrder used: Order A's T-shirt, export Make to Order for Northline ApparelTool: Delay recovery decision guide
This lesson is for a merchandiser or manager who receives a buyer's claim after a missed date. Lesson 6.2 helps but is not required. Figures are teaching figures; the case is Northline Apparel's claim on Order A's export run.
BuyerNorthline Apparel, letter of credit at shipment
FactoryDelta Garments, export Make to Order line
OrderOrder A's T-shirt, 15,000 pieces
Missed dateShip date missed by 3 days, air freight used to recover
MethodChecking what a claim actually names before agreeing to pay it
ToolDelay recovery decision guide
02Opening

This page explains how a buyer's claim for a missed date is calculated and disputed, for a merchandiser or manager who receives one

This page explains how a buyer's claim for a missed date is calculated and disputed, for a merchandiser or manager who receives one after a ship date has actually been missed. This lesson mainly teaches money: what a claim's own figure is built from, and which parts of it a factory can check against evidence rather than simply accept. Mona, the merchandiser at Delta Garments, must respond to Northline Apparel's claim once Order A's export run ships 3 days late despite the air freight recovery from lesson 6.2.

A person who has never seen a claim can treat any figure a buyer states as final, simply because the buyer is the one who was inconvenienced. A claim is not automatically correct just because it is stated with confidence; it is built from named costs, an air freight charge the buyer itself paid, lost retail sales, a discount given to keep a shop's order, each of which can be checked against evidence. Without knowing what a claim is built from, a factory risks paying more than the delay actually cost, or refusing to pay a cost that is genuinely proven.

03Before you start

What you need, and what this lesson does not cover

You need: lesson 6.2 is useful background, since this lesson picks up once a recovery option has already been tried and the date was still missed, but it is not required.

By the end of this lesson you can:

  • state what a buyer's claim for a missed date is, and what it is not;
  • name the costs a claim is typically built from;
  • check a claim's stated figure against the evidence the buyer provides for it;
  • calculate the size of a named cost, such as an air freight charge, from the order's own figures;
  • follow the method for responding to a claim before agreeing to pay it;
  • record a claim's checked figure on this course's working template.

Not covered here: choosing a recovery option before a date is missed (lesson 6.2); a chargeback as a separate, unilateral deduction (lesson 6.4); negotiating a live delayed order across all four options together (lesson 6.5).

04Key terms

Words you will meet in this lesson

TermMeaning
ClaimA buyer's request that the factory cover a stated cost the delay caused the buyer, such as an air-freight charge or lost retail sales, negotiated between the two sides.
Claim windowThe agreed number of days after delivery in which a buyer may raise a fault or shortage before the order counts as accepted.
ChargebackA cost the buyer deducts from what it pays the factory, to cover the buyer's own cost of fixing or replacing a failed shipment.
Air freightMoving goods by aeroplane. Much faster and much more expensive per unit of weight than sea freight.
Letter of creditA bank's own promise to pay the factory once it presents the documents an order's terms require, used on Order A's export sale to Northline Apparel.
Landed costThe FOB price plus shipping and duty once goods reach the buyer's own country, USD 3.70 per piece on Order A.
05Teaching
The rule

A buyer's claim is a negotiated request built from named costs, not an automatic figure a factory must accept without checking it

A buyer's claim for a missed date is a request, not an automatic deduction; it names specific costs the delay caused the buyer, and each named cost can be checked against evidence before a factory agrees to pay any of it. A claim differs from a chargeback in exactly this way, a chargeback in lesson 6.4 is a unilateral deduction the buyer simply takes, while a claim is negotiated between the two sides before any money changes hands. Checking a claim's own arithmetic and evidence, rather than accepting or rejecting it on the buyer's word alone, is what turns a dispute into a fair settlement.

A claim's own costs, checked one at a timeAir freight paidCheck the freight invoiceLost retail salesCheck the shop's own sales datesDiscount givenCheck the discount record
Each cost a claim names, an air freight charge, lost retail sales, or a discount given, can be checked against its own evidence before a factory agrees to pay it. A claim is a negotiation, not an automatic figure.
What you meet in real life

The shapes a buyer's claim takes across export, domestic, and different business models

What can differThe shapes you meetWhy it matters
Export, Make to OrderNorthline Apparel's claim on Order A names the extra air freight it paid to receive part of the order on time, an amount checked directly against a freight invoice.An export claim's costs are often easiest to check, since a shipping invoice is a fixed, dated document either side can read.
Export, retail-linked costA claim can also name lost retail sales at Northline's own shops if the delay pushed part of the order past a marked selling season, a cost harder to prove than a freight invoice.A cost without a clear, dated record is fair to question; the burden of showing the cost is real sits with the buyer making the claim.
Domestic, Make to StockA domestic buyer such as Cedar & Co. can also raise a claim, for example the cost of a promotional discount it had to give to move stock that arrived late for a planned event.The same checking method applies to a domestic claim; the size and kind of cost may differ, but the discipline of checking it does not.
Hybrid or agent-mediated ordersAn order placed through an agent such as Meridian Sourcing can see a claim raised by the agent on behalf of the buyer it represents, rather than the buyer contacting the factory directly.Who raises the claim does not change what it must show; an agent's claim still needs the same named costs and evidence as a direct buyer's claim.
The case we follow

Northline Apparel claims its own air freight cost after Order A's export run still ships 3 days late

Northline Apparel raises a claim on Delta Garments after Order A's export run ships 3 days late, despite the split shipment recovery option from lesson 6.2. Northline's claim states it paid an extra air freight charge itself, for the sea-freighted 7,500-piece portion, to bring some of those pieces forward once its own shops needed stock sooner than the split shipment's sea-freight leg would deliver. Mona, the merchandiser, asks Northline for the freight invoice before responding, rather than agreeing to the stated figure on its own.

The worked number

Checking Northline Apparel's claimed air freight figure against the master air freight cost per piece

This lesson's worked number checks a claim's own arithmetic against the order's known figures, rather than treating the claim's total as automatically correct.

Northline's claim: extra air freight paid on 2,000 pieces of the sea-freighted portion = USD 4,200
Master figure check: air freight adds USD 1.80 per piece over sea freight on Order A (section 7)
Expected cost at the master figure = 2,000 pieces x USD 1.80 = USD 3,600
Difference between the claim and the expected cost = USD 4,200 - USD 3,600 = USD 600
Claimed by NorthlineUSD 4,200Expected at USD 1.80/pieceUSD 3,600
Checking Northline Apparel's claimed air freight figure against the master per-piece rate finds a USD 600 difference, worth asking about before paying the claim in full. The invoice, not the claim's own total, settles which figure is correct.
The method

Checking a buyer's claim before agreeing to pay any part of it

  1. Ask for the evidence behind each named cost, a freight invoice, a sales record, or a discount record, before responding to the total.
  2. Recalculate each cost from the order's own known figures, such as the master air freight rate, to check it against what the buyer states.
  3. Flag any difference between the claim and the recalculated figure, as a specific, named question, not a blanket refusal.
  4. Separate proven costs from unproven ones, agreeing to pay what evidence supports and questioning what it does not.
  5. Record the checked and agreed figure, not the buyer's original claimed figure, once the two sides settle.
  6. Confirm the settlement in writing, closing the claim window on the specific costs it covered.
The trap

Paying a claim's stated total without checking it against the evidence behind it

A common mistake is paying a buyer's claim in full simply because refusing it feels like it would damage the relationship, without first checking the claim's own figures against evidence. As the worked number shows, even a claim built on a real cost, air freight actually paid, can contain a difference worth USD 600 on a single line once checked against the master rate, a gap that checking finds and paying on trust alone would not.

This trap costs a factory money on every claim it accepts without checking, not only on the specific difference found. A factory that always pays a claim's stated total, without asking for the invoice behind it, effectively invites every future claim to be rounded upward, since there is no cost to doing so from the buyer's side once the pattern is established.

06In plain words

When a buyer says a late delivery cost it money, that statement is the start of a conversation, not the end of one. The buyer should say exactly what the cost was, an extra freight bill it paid, sales it lost, a discount it had to give, and should be able to show something proving each one, like an invoice or a sales record. The factory should check that proof against what it already knows about its own order, rather than simply paying whatever number the buyer first states or refusing to pay anything at all. Most of the time, checking finds the claim is mostly right, with maybe a small difference worth asking about, and the two sides agree a fair final figure together.

07Quick check
  • A buyer's claim is a negotiated request built from named costs, not an automatic deduction.
  • Each cost a claim names can be checked against its own evidence, a freight invoice, a sales record, or a discount record.
  • A claim differs from a chargeback: a claim is negotiated, a chargeback is a deduction the buyer simply takes.
  • Recalculating a named cost from the order's own known figures can reveal a difference worth questioning.
  • Paying every claim on trust, without checking it, invites future claims to be rounded upward.
  • A settled claim should be confirmed in writing, closing the specific costs it covered.
08Workplace scenario

Mona receives Northline Apparel's claim for extra air freight and must decide whether to pay the stated figure

Mona, the merchandiser at Delta Garments, receives Northline Apparel's claim after Order A's export run ships 3 days late. The facts in front of her:

  • Northline's claim states an extra air freight cost of USD 4,200 on 2,000 pieces of the sea-freighted portion of the split shipment.
  • The master figure for Order A fixes the extra air freight cost at USD 1.80 per piece over sea freight.
  • Northline has not yet sent the freight invoice supporting its claimed figure.

The document Mona reads, Northline Apparel's own claim letter:

Northline Apparel, claim letter. "We incurred an additional air freight cost of USD 4,200 to bring forward 2,000 pieces of the sea-freighted portion of Order A, due to the 3-day delay against the confirmed ship date. We request Delta Garments reimburse this amount."

Should Mona agree to pay the USD 4,200 as stated, or ask for the freight invoice before responding? Decide before you open the answer.

Show decision

She should ask for the freight invoice before responding, since the claimed figure does not match the expected cost calculated from Order A's own master air freight rate. Recalculating 2,000 pieces at USD 1.80 per piece gives USD 3,600, a USD 600 difference from the USD 4,200 claimed.

Two facts, together, decide this. First, the master figure for Order A's air freight cost is fixed and known, so Mona can check the claim's arithmetic without needing to guess at the true cost. Second, Northline has not yet provided the invoice that would explain the USD 600 difference, so asking for it is a specific, evidence-based question, not a refusal to pay.

Paying the full USD 4,200 without asking would cost Delta Garments USD 600 more than the master figure supports, and would leave no record of having checked the claim at all, inviting the next claim to be rounded upward the same way.

09What it costs

The cost of paying a claim without checking it, against the cost of checking it properly

This lesson's cost is the gap checking finds against the gap trust alone would miss. On Northline Apparel's claim, checking the stated USD 4,200 against the master air freight rate finds a USD 600 difference, about 14% of the claimed amount, worth raising before payment. Across a year of claims on similar orders, accepting every claim's stated figure without checking could add several times this amount in unquestioned differences, money the factory's own profit margin, USD 0.26 per piece on Order A, cannot easily absorb.

10Working template

Delay recovery decision guide: recording a checked claim on the Decide sheet

Copy this row into the delay recovery decision guide's Decide sheet, using the claimed cost and the master figure you are checking it against.

Check pointSpec saysFound (your entry)Result
Claimed cost checked against the order's own master figuresRecalculate the claimed cost from the master figure and record the difference, if any

Download the full working sheet, with Northline Apparel's air freight claim already checked and filled in, from the link on this course's page.

Download the Delay recovery decision guide (Excel)

11Check yourself

1. What is a buyer's claim for a missed date?

2. Northline Apparel's claim states USD 4,200 for air-freighting 2,000 pieces. Order A's master figure fixes the extra cost at USD 1.80 per piece. What should Mona do before paying?

3. A different buyer claims USD 6,000 for air-freighting 3,000 pieces where the master rate is USD 1.50 extra per piece. Is the claim higher or lower than expected, and by how much?

12Glossary
ENARFRTRMeaning
ClaimمطالبةRéclamationTalepA buyer's request that the factory cover a stated cost the delay caused the buyer, such as an air-freight charge or lost retail sales, negotiated between the two sides.
Claim windowمهلة الشكوىDélai de réclamationŞikayet süresiThe agreed number of days after delivery in which a buyer may raise a fault or shortage before the order counts as accepted.
Chargebackخصم استردادRetenue sur paiementCeza kesintisiA cost the buyer deducts from what it pays the factory, to cover the buyer's own cost of fixing or replacing a failed shipment.
Air freightالشحن الجويFret aérienHava taşımacılığıMoving goods by aeroplane. Much faster and much more expensive per unit of weight than sea freight.
Letter of creditاعتماد مستنديLettre de créditAkreditifA bank promise to pay the factory once the shipping documents match the order.
Landed costالتكلفة بعد الوصولCoût renduTeslim maliyetiThe FOB price plus shipping and duty once goods reach the buyer's own country, USD 3.70 per piece on Order A.
13Next

Lesson 6.4: Chargebacks versus claims and what a factory can and cannot negotiate

You now know how a buyer's claim for a missed date is calculated and disputed. The next lesson tells a claim apart from a chargeback, using Cedar & Co.'s domestic order with Delta Garments. Back to the course map

14Ladder

RecognizeState what a buyer's claim for a missed date is, and what it is not.
ConnectSee which costs a claim is typically built from and what evidence proves each one.
CompareTell a claim apart from a chargeback in how each one is settled.
DecideCheck a claim's own figures before agreeing to pay it.